Archive for the ‘Ruby on Rails’ tag
Turning off auto timestamping for testing in Rails
Suppose that you implemented a functionality that depends on values of created_at or updated_at fields of your models. How do you test it?
If you use fixtures that reside in test/fixture/*.yml files then there is no problem, because the values you set there for created_at and updated_at fields are saved to the database ‘as is’. So you can easily have an article created one week ago:
article: title: What a great day created_at: <%= 1.week.ago.to_s(:db) %> updated_at: <%= 1.week.ago.to_s(:db) %>
However, I don’t use fixtures files myself. I feel a bit dirty using them ;) I find fixture replacement tools far more maintainable. Namely, I love thoughtbot’s Factory Girl. But here comes the problem. This won’t work as expected with Factory Girl:
Factory(:article, :created_at => 1.week.ago, :updated_at => 1.week.ago)
That’s because ActiveRecord’s automatic timestamping feature sets Time.now for created_at and updated_at fields overriding our values. At least that’s ActiveRecord’s default behavior. Fortunately it can be disabled with:
Article.record_timestamps = false
Chances are that after creating a model with a custom timestamp we’ll want to turn automatic timestamping back on. But turning it off and on in many places in your unit tests would be pretty cumbersome. Wouldn’t it be cool if you could achieve all of this with a snippet below?
without_timestamping_of Article do Factory(:article, :created_at => 1.week.ago, :updated_at => 1.week.ago) end
It turns timestamping off, executes the block and turns timestamping back on. I find it clean and dry. Here’s the code to place in your test_helper.rb:
# test_helper.rb class Test::Unit::TestCase # or class ActiveSupport::TestCase in Rails 2.3.x def without_timestamping_of(*klasses) if block_given? klasses.delete_if { |klass| !klass.record_timestamps } klasses.each { |klass| klass.record_timestamps = false } begin yield ensure klasses.each { |klass| klass.record_timestamps = true } end end end end
Of course you can turn off timestamping for many models at once:
without_timestamping_of Article, Comment, User do Factory(:article, :created_at => 1.week.ago, :updated_at => 1.week.ago) Factory(:comment, :created_at => 1.day.ago) Factory(:user, :updated_at => 5.hours.ago) end
Hope you like it. If so, share :)
Websecurity through conventions and best practices
As promised few days ago, I publish materials from a presentation I gave at IT Underground Conference in Prague, Czech Republic.
Here’s a slideshow with full speaker’s notes. Spread the word ;)
Speaking at IT Underground Security Conference and Workshop in Prague
Tomorrow I will be speaking at IT Underground Security Conference and Workshop in Prague, Czech Republic. That is three day long event that starts today.
I will give a talk on “Websecurity through conventions and best practices” which will be focused on securing web applications from the most common attacks with examples from Ruby on Rails web development framework.
Expect to see materials from the conf here in few days.
Rails 2.2.2, Ajax and respond_to
As I wrote some time ago in the article about Rails, Ajax and jQuery, sometimes there are problems with Rails not interpreting correctly content type headers of ajax requests. It’s because not all web browsers send that header in the same way.
What I proposed was to sort the request.accepts array (array containing content type headers sent by browser) so that xml content type would be the first element. That would then trigger format.xml in our respond_to block.
However that approach does not work in Rails 2.2.2, because now the request.accepts array is frozen and it cannot be modified. I spent some time googling for the solution, but with no effect. So I dived into the API and Rails’ source code and came up with pretty nice and simple solution to the problem.
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base before_filter :xhr_to_xml def xhr_to_xml request.format = :xml if request.xhr? end end
This piece of code is an equivalent of the snippet I proposed in the article I referred to at the beginning. Now all ajax request will trigger format.xml in respond_to blocks.
Rails, Ajax and jQuery
The more ajaxified application, the more fun it is to use. But it is also more painful do develop. What is written below is my approach to pairing Rails and Ajax. It’s a mix of tips I found over the net on blogs and forums. I use jQuery for JavaScript, but I don’t use jRails or any JS/Ajax helper methods provided by Rails. Note that all Javascript/HTML code presented here can be used even if you dont use Rails or Ruby as your web development platform. Let’s begin.
Rails is RESTful
Thanks to Rails’ RESTfulness the only thing to take care of server side is setting proper response in controllers’ actons.
class PostsController < ActionController::Base def index @posts = Post.find :all respond_to do |format| format.html format.xml { render :xml => @posts.to_xml } end end end
Rails decides which format block to call basing on routes defined in routes.rb file (map.connect ‘:controller/:action/:id.:format’) and accept headers sent with request by the client.
In most cases we want Ajax requests to trigger format.xml blocks in our controllers’ actions, so we need to set proper accept headers. Let’s do it just once with application-wide setting.
// All ajax requests will trigger the format.xml block // of +respond_to do |format|+ declarations $.ajaxSetup({ 'beforeSend': function(xhr) {xhr.setRequestHeader("Accept", "text/xml")} });
Browsers’ quirks
There is something worth noting here, a problem I had once with IE and Safari. The code above may work differently in various browsers. Browser set text/html accept header by default. Here IE and Safari will append text/xml to it so you’ll get something like ‘text/html; text/xml’, while Firefox will replace text/html with text/xml and you’ll get ‘text/xml’ only. This is very important because Rails will take the first format it detects in accept header and trigger respective block in controller’s action, which will be html for IE and Safari. Here’s a fix for this that shifts application/xml (if it is present) to the beggining of accept headers array.
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base before_filter :correct_safari_and_ie_accept_headers def correct_safari_and_ie_accept_headers request.accepts.sort!{ |x, y| y.to_s == 'application/xml' ? 1 : -1 } if request.xhr? end end
Ajaxify your links
Here’s a quick way to ajaxify your existing links. Add this JavaScript to your application.js file.
jQuery(document).ready(function() { // All A tags with class 'get', 'post', 'put' or 'delete' will perform an ajax call jQuery('a.get').livequery('click', function() { var link = jQuery(this); $.get(link.attr('href'), function(data) { if (link.attr('ajaxtarget')) jQuery(link.attr('ajaxtarget')).html(data); }); return false; }).attr("rel", "nofollow"); jQuery('a.post').livequery('click', function() { var link = jQuery(this); $.post(jQuery(this).attr('href'), "_method=post", function(data) { if (link.attr('ajaxtarget')) jQuery(link.attr('ajaxtarget')).html(data); }); return false; }).attr("rel", "nofollow"); jQuery('a.put').livequery('click', function() { var link = jQuery(this); $.post(jQuery(this).attr('href'), "_method=put", function(data) { if (link.attr('ajaxtarget')) jQuery(link.attr('ajaxtarget')).html(data); }); return false; }).attr("rel", "nofollow"); jQuery('a.delete').livequery('click', function() { var link = jQuery(this); $.post(jQuery(this).attr('href'), "_method=delete", function(data) { if (link.attr('ajaxtarget')) jQuery(link.attr('ajaxtarget')).html(data); }); return false; }).attr("rel", "nofollow"); jQuery('a.get, a.post, a.put, a.delete').removeAttr('onclick'); });
Just add a CSS class .get, .post, .delete, or .put to a link to make turn it into an ajax-link. I recommend you use LiveQuery plugin which will automatically bind click events to new links that appear on the page (loaded with Ajax call for-example). You can optionally set ajaxtarget attibute of the link. It expects a selector of a container in which you want to place the response.
link_to 'my cool article', article_path(@article), :class => 'get', :ajaxtarget => '#article_container'
Ajaxify your forms
For this you’d need jQuery Form Plugin.
jQuery('form.ajax').livequery('submit', function() { jQuery(this).ajaxSubmit(); return false; });
Now all your forms that have “ajax” class will be submitted via Ajax.
<form class="ajax"> ... </form>
CSRF and authenticity token
Rails has built-in protection from cross-site request forgery attacks. It relies on an authenticity token which Rails look for when dealing with POST, PUT or DELETE requests, so this token needs to be sent by the browser together with the request. The token is automatically added as a hidden field to any form you create with form_for method, it is also attached to links that have :method param set to :post, :put or :delete. In fact the token is added dynamically by Javascript code placed in link’s onclick attribute. However in one of code snippets above we stripped that onclick attribute from links to prevent the page reload after we click the link. Now we need to attack that token ourselves. First we will alter our application layout:
<head>
<% if protect_against_forgery? %>
<script type='text/javascript'>
//<![CDATA[
window._auth_token_name = "#{request_forgery_protection_token}";
window._auth_token = "#{form_authenticity_token}";
//]]>
</script>
<% end %>
</head>Now we need to ensure that the token is sent together with ajax requests.
jQuery(document).ready(function() { // All non-GET requests will add the authenticity token // if not already present in the data packet jQuery("body").bind("ajaxSend", function(elm, xhr, s) { if (s.type == "GET") return; if (s.data && s.data.match(new RegExp("\\b" + window._auth_token_name + "="))) return; if (s.data) { s.data = s.data + "&"; } else { s.data = ""; // if there was no data, $ didn't set the content-type xhr.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", s.contentType); } s.data = s.data + encodeURIComponent(window._auth_token_name) + "=" + encodeURIComponent(window._auth_token); }); });
We’re done, we have our ajax requests protected from CSRF attacks.
Modifing page after Ajax calls
Standard way to do page modification after Ajax call is to use Javascript code that inserts content returned by the call somewhere on the page. The other method is to put the modifying code in views that are returned by the server and just execute it in the browser. For this I’d recommend another jQuery plugin - Taconite. As the author says: “The jQuery Taconite Plugin allows you to easily make multiple DOM updates using the results of a single AJAX call. It processes an XML command document that contain instructions for updating the DOM”. Thanks to this you can for example easily use flash messages in your Ajax views.
Let this be a part of your usual layout:
<div id="flash_notice" class="flash"<%= ' style="display: none"' unless flash[:notice] %>><%= flash[:notice] %></div>
Now let this be your taconite layout you’d use when returning views for Ajax requests:
<taconite>
<hide select="#flash_notice" />
<% if flash[:notice] %>
<replaceContent select="#flash_notice">
<%= flash[:notice] %>
</replaceContent>
<fadeIn select="#flash_notice" arg1="slow" />
<% end %>
<%= yield %>
</taconite>This will display flash notice messages with fade-in effect after Ajax requests. Similarly you can update other elements of the page.
What’s in your toolbox?
I would love to hear from you on how you deal with Ajax in your web applications. What libraries/plugins do you use?
Custom thumbnail generation with Paperclip
Paperclip is a great plugin for Ruby on Rails which eases the pain of image upload and resize process. The usage is very simple, results are what you want in most cases. Not in all cases though.
Your role is only to define the sizes of thumbnails that will be generated from original image. Thumnailing in is fact done by calling ImageMagick’s convert command with -scale argument, for example convert -scale ‘640×480>’.
You can alter how exactly the image is scaled by appending modifiers to desired thumbnail size, like ‘>’ in ‘640×480>, however it won’t give you unlimited power over thumbnailing process.
Consider following example. I have a small image (120×120).

Scaling it to smaller size gives me the result I want. But when the result image needs to be bigger than original, the original image is enlarged in a way that you’ll see single pixels.
![]()
What I want to achieve is the enlargment done not by scaling the original image, but by adding a border around it.

This cannot be achieved by adding any of modifiers to desired thumbnail size, so why not to pass additional arguments to convert command? Yes, that would be a solution.
And here’s my solution - PaperclipExtended. It’s a plugin that modifies original Paperclip, so that now it accepts additional (optional) parameter :commands when defining the thumbnails sizes.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_attached_file :avatar, :styles => { :medium => "300x300>", :small => "100x100>" }, :commands => { :medium => "-background white -gravity center -extent 300x300 +repage" } end
During thumbnail generation Paperclip will now append given commands to convert command. Convert command for medium style will be now:
convert -scale ‘300×300>’ -background white -gravity center -extent 300×300 +repage
Convert command for small style will remain unchanged.
Passing such commands will help me with the enlargment I mentioned above. For what else could be done check the documentation of ImageMagick’s command line options.
PaperclipExtended is not a replacement for Paperclip, just an extension. It works with version 2.1.2 of Paperclip plugin (the current one and the only one I tested). Compatibility with future version is not guaranteed.
I put a plugin on GitHub.
http://github.com/netguru/paperclip-extended
How to install:
script/plugin install git://github.com/netguru/paperclip-extended.git
Configuration is the same as of original Paperclip plugin, but you can now add an optional :commands parameter.
Hope it’ll be helpful!
If you have any questions, post them in comments to this post.
